Archivo de la categoría: Christianity

How to Move from Forgiveness to Reconciliation

How to Move from Forgiveness to Reconciliation.

¡Qué importante este mensaje!


You Can’t Marry a Hot Vampire

(Tomado de Relevant Magazine)

Kent Woodyard

How fantasies like Twilight damage expectations for romance and reality.

A while back, Russell Moore wrote an article that made the assertion that romance novels are to women as pornography is to men. While Dr. Moore was quick to admit that “pornography and romance novels aren’t (or at least aren’t always) morally equivalent,” he claimed that they “work the same” because they are both rooted in illusion.

“Pornography is based on the illusion of a perfectly willing, always aroused partner without the ‘work’ of relational intimacy. Romance novels or their film equivalents do the same thing for the emotional needs of women that pornography offers for the erotic urges of men.” Lee el resto de esta entrada

Halloween no me asusta….

Halloween no me asusta…..

De 6 Ciegos y un Elefante

De 6 Ciegos y un Elefante.

Sufrimiento y Comunidad: 2 experiencias que nos roba la Teología de la Prosperidad

3 Bendito sea el Dios y Padre de nuestro Señor Jesucristo, Padre de misericordias y Dios de toda consolación, 4 quien nos consuela en todas nuestras tribulaciones, para que también nosotros podamos consolar a los que están sufriendo, por medio de la consolación con que nosotros somos consolados por Dios. 5 Porque así como abundan en nosotros las aflicciones de Cristo, así también por el mismo Cristo abunda nuestra consolación. 6 Si nosotros sufrimos, es para que ustedes reciban consolación y salvación; si somos consolados, es para que ustedes reciban consuelo y puedan soportar como nosotros cuando pasen por los mismos sufrimientos. 7 Firme es nuestra esperanza respecto a ustedes, pues sabemos que así como participan en nuestras aflicciones, también participan en nuestra consolación. (2 Corintios 1:3-7 RVC) 

Este pasaje nos abre los ojos a dos misericordias y bendiciones que Dios nos da y a las que hoy, la Teología de la Prosperidad nos está aislando e insensibilizando: el sufrimiento y la comunidad….específicamente, el sufrimiento EN comunidad.

Pablo nos revela aquí dos aspectos importantes de su relación con la iglesia en Corinto: 1. su admisión de su sufrimiento personal que es consolado por Dios y 2. la bendición de poder compartir esa experiencia con su comunidad de fe (la iglesia corintia) para que a través de ese compartir, venga un consuelo comunitario que al final, glorifica a Dios. Lee el resto de esta entrada

De por qué debemos deshacernos del mensaje de la supuesta prosperidad

El “evangelio de la prosperidad” no tiene en absoluto que ver con el Evangelio.  Mala teología con mala economía = frustración, pérdida de fe y pérdida de esperanza.  Prediquemos en Evangelio….eso es lo que el mundo y los cristianos necesitan.

Casa de Libertad

Los invito a todos a participar en el proyecto de Casa de Libertad.  Para enterarse, aprender lo que estamos haciendo y opinar y darnos sugerencias, métanse a .  Para nosotros es muy importante leer sus opiniones y también creo que es un muy buen ejercicio poner nuestras ideas por escrito, pensar en lo que es importante para nosotros, etc.

Ánimo, ayúdennos a construir el sueño.

Using Grape Juice Instead of Wine Is Like Using A Butter Cookie From The Girl Scouts Instead of Bread Some Might Say

Using Grape Juice Instead of Wine Is Like Using A Butter Cookie From The Girl Scouts Instead of Bread Some Might Say Jesus used fermented grapes to remember his blood sacrifice (Matt 26:26-28) but many churches use grape juice like Thomas Welch said. The Welch’s vs. Jesus and the Welch’s won? Hmm. Many have argued just how weird it is that churches use grape juice for communion when (1) Jesus said to use wine and (2) Scripture does not condemn the consumption alcohol by Christians. If you’re going to use grape juice you might as well use a cookie or something. What’s the difference? Unbiblical reason not to use wine no. 1: the Bible says that Christians should not drink alcohol at all. Myth. Find the verse. Unbiblical and dumb reason no. 2: people who struggle with alcoholism shouldn’t be tempted. What? The evangelical church is one of the most gluttonous and overeating communities you’ll find in America. If anything, we should worry that the bread will tempt people to go to Old Country Buffet and eat from the various troughs as they stuff themselves after church on Sunday. There are more overeaters in your church than alcoholics. Few pastors have the courage to address overeating however. SIDENOTE: What would happen if the church treated people with drinking problems and over-eating problems the same way? Ok, so the weaker brother argument won’t work here. Next? Stupid reason no. 3: we’ve always done it like this. Ahh, not really. Using grape juice is new folks. The United Methodist started this during the women’s temperance movement in the 1870s and 1880s. Here’s the real reason: people don’t know the history, they don’t like change, and many claim that doing what Jesus actually said would now dissension. I think we heard about this before in Galatia (law vs. grace). Fellas, AGAIN, remember that it was the temperance movement, that initially pushed Christians to never drink alcohol, even during communion. And United Methodist Minister Thomas Welch introduced the grape juice oddity (yes of Welch’s graps juice folks) embracing this feminist project. Why do churches still use grape juice? The only church I’ve been to that literally uses bread and wine like Jesus did was Intown Community Church in Atlanta. It was the most memorable time of celebrating the blesssed sacrament I’ve ever experienced. Maybe, that’s because I grew up United Methodist. The other times have been at an Anglican monastery I used to frequent in Michigan. Also Grace Orthodox Presbyterian Church uses wine like Jesus said instead of grape juice like the Welch’s said and the OPC’s explain why. Ahh, ya gotta love the OPCs!! The burden is on those who divert from what Jesus used by using grape juice. You cannot biblically justify using grape juice, can you? And P—-LEASE don’t offer the fiction about the wine Jesus used being non-alcoholic. There is no evidence for this at all. None. Christianity Today tells more of the story of how churches, driven by the women’s temperance movement, were dooped into switching from what Jesus actually used to what Thomas Welch, of the Welch’s Grape Juice empire, pursuaded churches to use. Fellas, what have you heard when it was explained to you by your church leaders when they justified following Thomas Welch by using grape juice instead of what Jesus used? Just curious. Wait a minute, don’t tell me you’ve never asked.

The Call of Samuel

The following article is located at:

The Call of Samuel
Samuel Rodriguez wants to build a bridge between Hispanic and Anglo evangelicals.
by Tim Stafford | posted 09/20/2006 09:30 a.m.

Related articles and links

"That was Harry Reid," says Samuel Rodriguez, folding his flip phone as he leaves a strip-mall chain restaurant. It is an April day, and Congress is warring over immigration. "They are really courting us. You should have heard the way Nancy Pelosi was talking."

Rodriguez is a young 36 with longish hair and a neat black goatee. Fast-talking, articulate, utterly bilingual, he exudes confidence. Rodriguez is a "brilliant thinker and an authentic man of God," according to National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) president Ted Haggard. "He is the Karl Rove of Hispanic-Anglo evangelical strategy."

Consulting with the Senate minority leader, however, is new territory. With immigration topping the news, Rodriguez has become a go-to guy. He started the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference (NHCLC) six years ago to be a voice for Hispanic evangelicals. Suddenly, everybody in Washington—media and politicians—wants to talk to him.

Rodriguez should be happy with his new prominence, but he doesn’t look entirely happy. "Immigration puts us at odds with our white evangelical brothers," he says. He has spent years building alliances, and now he is unsure whether they will last. Rodriguez knows what happened with civil rights. To this day, many African American Christians distrust white evangelicals even though they share views on school prayer, abortion, and gay marriage. Hispanic evangelicals might similarly resist alliances with those they perceive as blind to their core concerns. That is the last thing Samuel Rodriguez wants.

At a Washington press conference in April, Rodriguez and a coalition of Christian leaders issued a statement in favor of "comprehensive immigration reform"—bolstering border security while providing a path to citizenship for some immigrants living in the United States. Many evangelical groups went missing, though Focus on the Family and the NAE (through Richard Cizik, the association’s Washington representative) came to give moral support. Instead, Ted Kennedy showed up.

"We need to know from white evangelical leaders," Rodriguez was quoted saying in The Washington Post, "why did they not support comprehensive immigration reform, why they came down in favor exclusively of enforcement without any mention of the compassionate side, without any mention of the Christian moral imperatives?

"So down the road, when the white evangelical community calls us and says, ‘We want to partner with you on marriage, we want to partner on family issues,’ my first question will be: ‘Where were you when 12 million of our brothers and sisters were about to be deported and 12 million families disenfranchised?’"

Rodriguez would far prefer to have evangelical politicians, rather than Kennedy, line up behind him for photo-ops. It pains him to seem to threaten retaliation. But he’s only offering a dose of reality. Immigration is a family issue for Hispanics. That illegal immigrant is, for them, beloved Uncle Carlos, a hard-working family man and deacon at the church. It’s hard to build alliances with people who want to put Uncle Carlos in jail.

Rodriguez emphasizes that he’s not defending violations of the law. He is all for border control and immigration enforcement. He feels, however, that the argument has become anti-immigrant and anti-Hispanic. "I’m very disappointed. We need dialogue on why white evangelicals are so threatened by people who are so fundamentally in accord with their values."

Talk about "illegals" particularly grates. "What they do is illegal, but to call them ‘illegals’ is against the Bible. How can a human being be illegal? That’s the very way abortion is justified."

On the other hand, Rodriguez is taking heat from some Hispanic church leaders who think he’s bent over too far to appease Anglos. NHCLC board member Angel Nunez, pastor of Bilingual Christian Church of Baltimore, explains: "There are people who are saying, ‘Why should you sit at the table to eat with somebody who is a racist?’ Some groups in the Latino community feel betrayed, and they say, ‘We don’t need them.’" But Rodriguez remains the man in the middle.

American Dream
Rodriguez is a first-generation American, born to Puerto Rican parents who came to America for work. His father found the American dream at a Mack truck factory in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. He subsequently lost his job—and the family home—when Samuel Jr. was 10. But Rodriguez’s parents worked hard and emphasized school and church. The family found other jobs and thrived.

Rodriguez’s grandparents also immigrated, living for a time in Samuel’s home. An Assemblies of God leader in Puerto Rico, Rodriguez’s grandfather took the Good Samaritan parable literally. He often brought homeless people home and, when challenged, loudly recited the parable.

Rodriguez Jr. learned his first words of English in kindergarten. He caught on fast, did well in school, and graduated from Kutztown University of Pennsylvania, subsequently earning an M.A. in educational leadership at Lehigh University.

Education was important, but ministry topped everything. When Rodriguez was 14, a visiting evangelist stopped his message midstream and asked if there was a young man in the congregation named Samuel. When Rodriguez raised his hand, the evangelist said he had a message from God: Samuel would be a prominent leader of his people.

By 16, he was preaching to youth rallies and conventions. Before 17, he was spending every weekend speaking in churches across America. "I offered a different model from the typical reformed drug addict who spoke to youth," Rodriguez says. He was a good student, born and raised in the church, lacking a history of iniquity.

By the time he turned 18, the Assemblies of God had appointed Rodriguez to oversee Hispanic youth ministry in his region of more than 300 churches. In college, Rodriguez began to talk with charismatic and Pentecostal church leaders about creating a nationwide voice for the Hispanic evangelical church. He knew it was a vital, growing force, but who outside the subculture knew it that way?

In 1996, he and some friends began to organize state congresses for Hispanic evangelicals. Some of the annual assemblies grew to be the largest Hispanic gatherings in their state. They urged Hispanic churches to take leadership in their communities—to register to vote, to reach out and form alliances with like-minded evangelicals. "Hispanics have decided we’re not going to isolate," Rodriguez says. "Our way of healing is through collaboration and mutual respect."

In the meantime, Rodriguez and his wife, Eva, had taken on a small church in New York City. It grew quickly but endured an ugly split. Just 30, Rodriguez resigned and soon found himself with a much bigger job, one that has taken all his energy the past six years: president of the NHCLC.

Hope of the Founders
Hispanic immigrants, Rodriguez says, instinctively view the church as a home and a refuge. For generations, that refuge has been the Catholic church, but now evangelical churches qualify, too. Though 74 percent of foreign-born Hispanics consider themselves Roman Catholic, many realign once they reach the United States. Immigrants find that Hispanic pastors understand their dilemmas.

Evangelical Hispanics, often Pentecostal or charismatic, tend to be aggressively evangelistic. "If you are a Hispanic immigrant to America, you’re going to get hit by the evangelical message," Rodriguez says. "Somebody at work, somebody in your neighborhood will talk to you."

The NHCLC aims to represent this low-profile evangelical community. Rodriguez has built on a foundation of Hispanic networking laid in the 1990s by Jesse Miranda, founding president of the National Alliance of Evangelical Ministries (amen: Alianza de Ministerios Evangélicos Nacionales). Of course, not all Hispanic evangelicals support the NHCLC’s work. But the organization is trying hard to draw others in. A board was formed: one representative from each state, plus a representative from each denomination or network that takes up membership. Rodriguez was chosen as president, and an office was set up in Sacramento.

In addition to annual state congresses in all 50 states and Puerto Rico, NHCLC organizes task forces and roundtable forums on key national issues. They seek alliances with other national organizations, including the NAE. "We don’t want to be ethnocentric," Rodriguez says. "We want to work within the evangelical church." He believes Hispanic evangelicals will lead their community into the American mainstream.

In that respect the immigration controversy could be a godsend. "We want to facilitate a dialogue. We are an oracle of truth, shouting, ‘Don’t fear the Hispanics, they share your values!’ If I were one of the Founding Fathers hearing about a brown-skinned people who would come to settle in America with a strong Judeo-Christian worldview, with a Calvinistic work ethic, law-abiding peaceable citizens with a love for America, for family, for church, I would surely embrace them. Our elevator speech is, ‘We will preserve the Judeo-Christian ethos of the Founding Fathers.’"

Give and Take
Rodriguez says that Hispanic street demonstrations suggest that political apathy has ended. "Hispanic Americans have never had a viable civil-rights movement," he says. "This is it—the catalyst for the mobilization of the Hispanic community in America."

Felix Posos, chair of the NHCLC board, says, "Hispanic evangelicals are not out there on the street raising banners. They are silent. But they are voters." A political and social agenda is increasingly evident, as the Pentecostal message widens from personal piety to community transformation. Evangelical pastors see themselves as leaders for the whole community.

"I think Sam is destined to be a national figure," says former ServiceMaster executive Richard Armstrong, who serves with Rodriguez on the board of Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary. "People are attracted to him. He’s a deeply spiritual man."

When asked whether he expects Hispanic evangelicals to influence the wider church, Rodriguez says, "Yes, yes, yes! We’re the fastest growing!" He has a classic evangelical confidence growing partly out of sheer numerical vitality. He also believes Hispanics offer a unique perspective. "In the culture wars, Hispanics are on the values side. But social justice is more a part of our ethos [than for other evangelicals]," he explains. "We’re attuned to poverty, homelessness, AIDS. We have a more complete vision of the gospel."

That’s not a complaint; it’s a vision Rodriguez seeks to share. He holds out the palm of his hand. "From day one we made a commitment. None of this." He nods toward his open palm. "No paternalism. No junior partners. We never ask for help. We always say, ‘How can we help you?’ Man, we need to change the mindset that our white brothers will take care of us. We’re committed to helping the white evangelical church, the African American evangelical church, the broad evangelical church. We are committed to give more than we take. That’s the only way there can be equity and mutual respect.

"I love our people," Rodriguez says, "and ‘our people’ is not the Hispanic people. I love the church so much."

Tim Stafford is a senior writer for CT.

Copyright © 2006 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.
September 2006, Vol. 50, No. 9, Page 82

Comentarios sobre Hechos 17:10-12

Estoy trabajando en un bosquejo de mensaje relacionado con el tema de "grupos pequeños" o "células".  Como base para el mensaje, estoy utilizando el texto de Hechos 17:10-12:

10Tan pronto como se hizo de noche, los hermanos enviaron a Pablo y a Silas a Berea, quienes al llegar se dirigieron a la sinagoga de los judíos.

 11Éstos eran de sentimientos más nobles que los de Tesalónica, de modo que recibieron el mensaje con toda avidez y todos los días examinaban las Escrituras para ver si era verdad lo que se les anunciaba.

 12Muchos de los judíos creyeron, y también un buen número de griegos, incluso mujeres distinguidas y no pocos hombres.

Me encantaría saber qué opinan sobre este texto en cuánto a su aplicación directa al tema de grupos pequeños. ¿Qué podemos aprender de los habitantes de Berea? ¿De Pablo en esta situación?

A %d blogueros les gusta esto: